Can a Trust Shield Your Assets If Your Child Gets Divorced?

Last reviewed: 24 May 2026 by the MP Estate Planning editorial team. Jurisdiction: England and Wales. Scotland and Northern Ireland have different probate and intestacy rules; the IHT thresholds are UK-wide.

As parents, we naturally want to protect our children’s financial security — even when life doesn’t go to plan. With the UK divorce rate sitting at around 42%, the risk of a child’s marriage breaking down is a genuine concern. The question many families ask is: can a trust protect the inheritance we’ve worked hard to build from being divided in a divorce settlement?

The short answer is yes — but only if the right type of trust is used and it’s established properly, well in advance. A discretionary trust, in particular, can ring-fence your child’s inheritance so that it never becomes part of their matrimonial property. As Mike Pugh of MP Estate Planning puts it: “What house? I don’t own a house.” That’s the principle in action — if your child is a potential beneficiary of a trust rather than the outright owner of assets, there’s far less for a divorcing spouse to claim. For more on how this works in practice, visit our page on divorce-proofing your assets.

Key Takeaways

• A properly drafted discretionary trust can keep your child’s inheritance outside their matrimonial property, offering strong protection if they divorce.
• The type of trust matters enormously — a bare trust offers virtually no divorce protection, while a discretionary trust offers the most.
• Timing is critical: trusts established years before any marital difficulties arise are far more robust than those created at the last minute.
• Family courts in England and Wales have wide powers under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, but a well-structured trust with independent trustees is significantly harder to attack.
• Specialist legal advice is essential — trusts are not a DIY project. As Mike says, “The law — like medicine — is broad. You wouldn’t want your GP doing surgery.”

Understanding the Concept of a Trust

England invented trust law over 800 years ago, and trusts remain one of the most powerful legal arrangements available for protecting family wealth. A trust is not a legal entity — it has no separate legal personality. Instead, it is a legal arrangement under which the trustees hold legal ownership of assets and manage them for the benefit of named beneficiaries, in accordance with the terms of the trust deed.

What is a Trust?

A trust involves three key roles: the settlor (the person who creates the trust and transfers assets into it), the trustees (who hold legal title to the assets and manage them), and the beneficiaries (who benefit from the trust assets). Because the trustees — not the beneficiaries — are the legal owners, assets held in trust are separated from the beneficiaries’ personal wealth. This separation is precisely what makes trusts so effective for divorce protection: your child can benefit from the trust without personally owning the assets, meaning those assets are not part of their matrimonial property.

Types of Trusts in the UK

In England and Wales, trusts are primarily classified by when they take effect (lifetime trust vs will trust) and how they operate. The three main operational types are discretionary trusts, bare trusts, and interest in possession trusts. Understanding the differences is essential, because the type of trust determines the level of protection your family receives.

The discretionary trust is, by a significant margin, the most commonly used trust for asset protection — and for good reason. Around 98–99% of family protection trusts are structured as discretionary trusts. If divorce protection is one of your goals, a bare trust is not suitable and should be avoided.

Why Consider Asset Protection?

The financial consequences of divorce can be devastating to family wealth — wealth that may have taken generations to build. With around 42% of UK marriages ending in divorce, this is not a remote risk. It’s a statistical probability that at least one child in a family with two or more children will go through a marital breakdown.

Divorce and Financial Implications

In England and Wales, the family court has very wide discretion under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 to divide matrimonial assets in a way it considers fair. The starting point for long marriages is typically a 50/50 split of all assets, including the family home, savings, investments, and pensions. The court considers factors such as the length of the marriage, the needs of both parties and any children, earning capacity, and the standard of living during the marriage.

To illustrate the potential financial implications of divorce on inherited wealth, consider the following:

The Role of Trusts in Asset Protection

Trusts are one of the most effective tools available for protecting family wealth from divorce. The key principle is straightforward: if your child doesn’t own the assets, their divorcing spouse cannot claim them. By placing assets in a discretionary trust, the trustees — not your child — hold legal ownership. Your child may benefit from the trust at the trustees’ discretion, but they have no legal right to the assets. This fundamentally changes the position in divorce proceedings.

A discretionary trust established by parents is particularly powerful because the assets were never your child’s property in the first place. Trusts can offer a strong level of protection for family wealth, allowing families to preserve assets across generations rather than seeing them eroded through divorce settlements.

For example, if you place your family home into a discretionary trust with your children named as potential beneficiaries, the property is owned by the trustees. If one of your children later divorces, that property sits outside their personal wealth entirely. The trustees can still allow your child to benefit — perhaps by providing accommodation or financial support — but on terms the trustees control, not terms dictated by a divorce court.

Understanding the role of trusts in asset protection empowers families to take proactive steps. As Mike Pugh often says, “Not losing the family money provides the greatest peace of mind above all else.” Planning ahead — before any marital difficulties arise — is the key to effective protection.

How Trusts Operate during Divorce

Divorce proceedings in England and Wales can be financially complex, and understanding how trusts operate during this process is crucial for effective trust asset protection. The family court’s treatment of trust assets differs fundamentally from its treatment of personally held assets — and that distinction is the foundation of divorce protection planning.

During divorce proceedings under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, the court examines all “financial resources” available to each party. Assets held personally are straightforwardly part of the matrimonial pot. Assets held in a properly structured discretionary trust occupy a very different legal position.

Trust Ownership vs. Personal Ownership

The distinction between trust ownership and personal ownership is the cornerstone of divorce protection. In a trust, the trustees are the legal owners of the assets — not the beneficiaries. Your child, as a discretionary beneficiary, has no legal right to any trust property. They have merely a hope — sometimes called a “mere expectancy” — that the trustees may choose to benefit them.

This is fundamentally different from personal ownership, where assets belong outright to the individual and are fully available for division in divorce. With a discretionary trust, the divorcing spouse’s solicitor cannot simply demand a share of trust assets because those assets do not belong to their client’s spouse. The trustees — who may be independent of both parties — hold the assets and exercise their own judgment about distributions.

In contrast, a bare trust offers virtually no protection in this regard. Because the beneficiary of a bare trust has an absolute entitlement to the assets from age 18 (under the principle in Saunders v Vautier), the court will treat bare trust assets as personally owned. This is why specialist advice on trust type is so important.

The Role of Trustees

Trustees play a pivotal role in protecting trust assets during a beneficiary’s divorce. Their core responsibility is to manage the trust in accordance with the trust deed for the benefit of all beneficiaries — not just the one going through a divorce. This fiduciary duty gives trustees both the authority and the obligation to act independently.

When a beneficiary is going through a divorce, trustees must exercise careful judgment. They are under no obligation to make distributions simply because a divorcing spouse (or even the family court) requests it. In practice, well-advised trustees may:

• Pause or reduce distributions to the divorcing beneficiary to avoid those funds being treated as income or resources
• Consider the interests of all other beneficiaries, not just the one facing divorce
• Take independent legal advice on any court orders that purport to affect trust assets
• Document all decisions thoroughly to demonstrate they are exercising genuine discretion

The strength of this protection depends on trustees genuinely exercising independent discretion. If the court concludes that a beneficiary effectively controls the trust — for example, because they are the sole trustee and sole beneficiary — the protection is severely weakened. This is why having at least two trustees, ideally including someone independent of the beneficiary, is so important for divorce and trust planning.

Types of Trusts that Offer Protection

When considering asset protection in the context of divorce, the type of trust you choose makes an enormous difference. Not all trusts are created equal — the level of protection ranges from excellent to virtually non-existent, depending on the trust structure. Here we examine the main types of trust used for family asset protection and how they compare.

Discretionary Trusts

Discretionary trusts are overwhelmingly the best choice for divorce protection, and they represent the vast majority (around 98–99%) of trusts established for family asset protection in England and Wales. In a discretionary trust, the trustees have absolute discretion to decide how to distribute the trust’s income and capital among the beneficiaries. No individual beneficiary has any right or entitlement to anything — they are merely potential recipients.

This is the critical feature that provides divorce protection. Because your child has no entitlement to trust assets, those assets cannot be classified as their property or their financial resource in any meaningful sense. A divorcing spouse’s solicitor has very little to work with.

The key characteristics of discretionary trusts that make them so effective include:

• No fixed entitlement: Beneficiaries have a mere hope of benefit, not a legal right — making it exceptionally difficult for a divorcing spouse to claim a share
• Trustee control: Independent trustees decide if, when, and how much any beneficiary receives
• Flexibility: Trustees can respond to changing family circumstances, including directing benefits away from a beneficiary going through divorce
• Longevity: Discretionary trusts can last up to 125 years, protecting wealth across multiple generations

Family Trusts

The term “family trust” is not a technical legal classification but rather describes any trust established for the benefit of family members. In practice, most family trusts used for asset protection are structured as discretionary trusts. When people refer to a “family trust,” they typically mean a discretionary trust with family members named as the class of potential beneficiaries.

A comparison of the main trust types for divorce protection is provided below:

The bottom line is clear: if divorce protection is a priority, a discretionary trust is the right tool. Bare trusts should be avoided entirely for this purpose, and interest in possession trusts offer only partial protection. Getting specialist advice on the correct trust structure is essential — it can mean the difference between your family’s wealth being protected or being divided in a divorce court.

How a Trust Can Shield Assets

In England and Wales, discretionary trusts have a proven track record of protecting family wealth from divorce claims. The legal principle is straightforward: your child cannot lose what they don’t own. But understanding both the protections and the limitations is important for realistic expectations.

Legal Protections Offered

A well-drafted discretionary trust provides several layers of legal protection against divorce claims:

1. Separation of ownership: The trust assets are legally owned by the trustees, not by your child. This means they do not form part of your child’s personal estate and are not automatically classified as a “financial resource” in divorce proceedings.

2. No entitlement = no claim: In a discretionary trust, beneficiaries have no legal right to any distribution. A divorcing spouse cannot claim a share of something their partner doesn’t own and has no right to receive. This is the “What house? I don’t own a house” principle in action.

3. Trustee independence: Trustees exercise their own discretion about distributions. They can legitimately decide not to distribute assets to a beneficiary who is going through divorce, particularly where doing so would benefit the divorcing spouse rather than the intended beneficiary.

4. Third-party creation: Where the trust was established by parents (rather than by the child themselves), the court is far less likely to treat it as a resource available to the child. The assets were never the child’s property — they were placed into trust by the parents for the benefit of the wider family.

Limitations of Trusts

While discretionary trusts offer strong protection, it’s important to understand their limitations. The family courts in England and Wales have very wide powers under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, and no protection mechanism is absolutely expected.

Timing matters enormously. A trust established years before any marital difficulties arise is far more robust than one created when divorce is already on the horizon. If a court concludes that the trust was set up specifically to defeat a spouse’s financial claims, it may look through the trust structure and treat the assets as available to the parties.

Control is the vulnerability. If the court finds that your child effectively controls the trust — for example, where they are the sole trustee, or where trustees routinely distribute whatever the beneficiary asks for — the protection can be significantly weakened. The court may treat the trust as a “resource” available to the beneficiary, even if they don’t technically own the assets.

Sham trusts will fail. If a trust exists only on paper and the settlor or beneficiary continues to treat the assets as their own personal property, the court may conclude the trust is a sham and disregard it entirely.

To maximise protection, the trust must be properly established, genuinely administered by independent-minded trustees, and set up well in advance of any foreseeable dispute. Specialist legal advice from a solicitor experienced in trust law is essential — not a generalist who dabbles in estate planning.

Drafting a Trust for Asset Protection

Creating a trust that will stand up to scrutiny in divorce proceedings requires careful planning and attention to detail. A poorly drafted trust can be worse than no trust at all, because it creates a false sense of security while offering little real protection. Here are the key considerations.

Key Considerations

When drafting a trust for divorce protection, several critical factors determine whether the trust will achieve its purpose:

• Trust type: A discretionary trust is almost always the correct choice for divorce protection. Bare trusts offer no meaningful protection, and interest in possession trusts offer limited protection.
• Trustee selection: At least two trustees are required. Including someone independent of the beneficiary significantly strengthens protection. The settlor (parent) can also be a trustee, which helps maintain oversight and control.
• Beneficiary class: Naming a broad class of beneficiaries (e.g., “my children and their descendants”) rather than a single named beneficiary reinforces the discretionary nature of the trust.
• Timing: The trust should be established well before any foreseeable marital difficulties — ideally years in advance. This demonstrates that the trust serves genuine family planning purposes rather than being a response to impending divorce.
• Trust deed drafting: The trust deed must clearly establish that trustees have absolute discretion, with no entitlement for any beneficiary. Powers should be carefully defined — Mike Pugh’s trusts, for example, include “Standard and Overriding powers” that give trustees clearly defined authority without making the trust revocable.

Legal Assistance Needed

Given the complexities involved, specialist legal assistance is essential — not optional. A trust that is drafted incorrectly, uses the wrong structure, or fails to comply with UK trust law requirements could fail to protect your family when it matters most.

Specialist legal assistance ensures:

• The correct type of trust is selected for your family’s specific circumstances and goals.
• The trust deed is drafted to withstand scrutiny from a divorce court — with properly defined trustee powers and no automatic beneficiary entitlements.
• Compliance with all legal requirements, including Trust Registration Service (TRS) registration with HMRC within 90 days.
• Proper transfer of assets into the trust, including Land Registry requirements if property is involved (TR1 form for unencumbered property, or a declaration of trust where a mortgage exists — transferring beneficial interest while legal title remains with the mortgagor until the mortgage is discharged).

Trusts are not just for the rich — they’re for the smart. But they must be set up by someone who specialises in this area. A straightforward family trust can cost from around £850, which is a fraction of what could be lost in a divorce settlement. When you compare that one-time cost to potentially losing half a family home worth £290,000, the value speaks for itself.

Case Studies: Trusts in Divorce Scenarios

Understanding how trusts have performed in real-world divorce situations helps illustrate both their strengths and potential weaknesses. While specific case details vary, there are clear patterns in how English family courts treat trust assets — and the lessons are instructive for anyone considering a trust for asset protection.

Examining Successful Asset Protection

Trusts that successfully protect assets in divorce typically share common features: they were established well in advance of any marital difficulties, they are genuinely discretionary, and they have independent trustees who exercise real discretion. Consider a common scenario: parents establish a discretionary trust holding the family home, with their children named as potential beneficiaries. Years later, when one child goes through a divorce, the trustees hold firm — the property belongs to the trust, not to the child, and the divorcing spouse has no claim against it.

In reported cases such as Charman v Charman [2007], while the court examined offshore trust structures in detail, the case reinforced that the court must consider the reality of a trust arrangement. Where a trust is genuinely discretionary, with trustees exercising genuine independence, the assets are significantly harder to access in divorce proceedings.

Key factors that make trust protection succeed:

• Early establishment: Trusts created years before any marital difficulties are far more robust — they clearly serve genuine estate planning purposes
• Genuine discretion: Trustees must actually exercise independent judgment, not simply rubber-stamp the beneficiary’s requests
• Third-party settlor: Where the trust was established by parents rather than by the beneficiary themselves, the court is far less likely to treat it as a resource under the beneficiary’s control
• Multiple beneficiaries: A broad class of beneficiaries demonstrates that the trust serves wider family purposes, not just the interests of one individual

Lessons from Unsuccessful Cases

When trusts fail to protect assets in divorce, there are usually clear reasons. The most common is timing — a trust created shortly before or during divorce proceedings will almost certainly be viewed by the court as an attempt to defeat the spouse’s financial claims.

Another common failure point is lack of genuine independence. If a beneficiary is also the sole trustee, or if trustees have a consistent pattern of distributing whatever the beneficiary requests, the court may conclude that the trust is effectively controlled by the beneficiary. In such cases, the court can — and will — treat the trust assets as a financial resource available to the parties.

The case of Thomas v Thomas [1995] established that the court can consider trust assets as a financial resource when the beneficiary has effective control over distributions. The court looks at the reality of the arrangement, not just the legal paperwork.

The lesson is clear: a trust must be genuine, well-established, and properly administered to provide effective protection. Plan, don’t panic — creating a trust as a knee-jerk reaction to impending divorce is the worst possible approach.

To avoid potential pitfalls, families should seek specialist advice and establish trusts as part of long-term estate planning rather than as an emergency response to relationship difficulties.

Common Misconceptions about Trusts

Many families harbour misconceptions about trusts that can lead to poor planning decisions or unrealistic expectations. Let’s address the most common myths and set out the reality under English and Welsh law.

Myths vs. Reality

One common myth is that placing assets in any type of trust automatically makes them untouchable in divorce. This is not the case. As we’ve discussed, a bare trust offers virtually no protection because the beneficiary has an absolute entitlement to the assets. Even a well-structured discretionary trust is not an impenetrable fortress — the family courts have wide powers and will look at the reality of the situation.

Another misconception is that trusts are only for the wealthy. In reality, with the average home in England now worth around £290,000, ordinary homeowners have significant wealth to protect. A discretionary trust starting from around £850 is accessible to most families — and when you compare that to potentially losing half the family home in a child’s divorce, the value is clear.

A third myth is that you can set up a trust at any time — even after your child announces they’re separating — and it will protect assets. Timing is everything. A trust established long before any marital difficulties has strong legitimacy. One created as divorce looms will almost certainly be challenged and may be set aside by the court.

Understanding the Legal Framework

The legal framework governing trusts in divorce is shaped by the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (which gives the family court its wide powers to divide assets), general trust law principles developed over eight centuries of English case law, and the Trustee Act 2000 (which governs trustee duties and powers).

Under the Matrimonial Causes Act, the court can consider any “financial resources” available to a party — which may include resources they are likely to receive from a trust in the foreseeable future. However, a properly structured discretionary trust where the beneficiary has no entitlement, and trustees genuinely exercise independent discretion, makes this far more difficult for the court. What happens to a trust after divorce in the UK depends heavily on how the trust was structured and administered in the first place.

By understanding the legal reality — rather than the myths — families can make informed decisions about using trusts for asset protection and seek the right specialist advice to set them up properly.

The Role of Family Courts in Trust Disputes

Family courts in England and Wales have wide discretionary powers when it comes to financial settlements on divorce, and understanding how they view trusts is essential for anyone relying on a trust for asset protection.

Court Decisions and Trusts

Under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, the family court can consider any “resources” that a party is likely to have in the foreseeable future. This potentially includes benefits from a trust. However, the court’s ability to access trust assets depends heavily on the type of trust and the degree of control the beneficiary exercises.

In the case of Charman v Charman [2007] EWCA Civ 503, the Court of Appeal examined the treatment of an offshore trust in detail. The court held that where a trust is genuinely discretionary and trustees exercise genuine independence, the trust assets are not simply treated as belonging to the beneficiary. However, where the beneficiary has effective control — or where trustees have a pattern of acceding to the beneficiary’s wishes — the court may treat the trust as a financial resource available for distribution.

Similarly, in Thomas v Thomas [1995], the court established that it can look at the likelihood of a trustee exercising discretion in the beneficiary’s favour when assessing available resources. The court looks at the substance of the arrangement, not just its legal form.

Implications for Trusts

The case law establishes several important principles for families relying on trusts for divorce protection:

Discretionary trusts with independent trustees are the strongest structure. Where trustees exercise genuine, independent discretion — and have a track record of doing so — the court is far less likely to treat the trust assets as available to the divorcing beneficiary.

The court will look at the reality, not just the paperwork. If a trust is discretionary on paper but the beneficiary effectively controls it, the court may pierce the trust structure. This is why having at least two trustees (preferably including someone independent) and maintaining proper records of trustee decision-making is so important.

Third-party trusts are harder to attack. Where the trust was established by the beneficiary’s parents rather than by the beneficiary themselves, the court recognises that these are genuinely independent family arrangements — not vehicles created by the divorcing party to hide assets.

The table below summarises how the court is likely to view different trust types:

For more detailed information on asset protection trusts and how they can be structured for business owners, you can visit our page on asset protection trusts for directors and entrepreneurs.

Navigating the complexities of trust disputes during divorce is challenging, but with the right planning and structure in place — ideally years before any difficulties arise — families can significantly strengthen their position. As Mike Pugh says, “Plan, don’t panic.”

Conclusion: Weighing the Benefits and Drawbacks

As we’ve explored throughout this article, a properly structured discretionary trust is one of the most effective tools available under English law for protecting family assets from a child’s divorce. The principle is elegantly simple: if your child doesn’t own the assets, their divorcing spouse cannot claim them.

However, not all trusts are equal. A bare trust offers virtually no divorce protection. An interest in possession trust offers moderate protection. Only a discretionary trust — with genuinely independent trustees, a broad class of beneficiaries, and established well in advance — provides the robust protection that most families need. The trust must be genuine, properly administered, and set up for legitimate estate planning reasons.

Protecting Your Family’s Future

To protect family assets from divorce effectively, the following elements are essential: choosing the right type of trust (discretionary), appointing at least two trustees including someone independent, establishing the trust years before any foreseeable marital difficulties, ensuring trustees genuinely exercise their discretion, and seeking specialist legal advice from someone who focuses on trust law — not a generalist solicitor.

With the UK divorce rate at around 42%, this is not a remote or theoretical risk. For a family with two or more children, the probability that at least one marriage will break down is significant. The cost of a properly structured trust — from around £850 — is negligible compared to the potential loss of half a family home worth £290,000 or more. As Mike Pugh puts it, “Not losing the family money provides the greatest peace of mind above all else.” Keeping families wealthy strengthens the country as a whole.

Final Considerations

Ultimately, the decision to establish a trust should be part of a comprehensive estate plan that also addresses inheritance tax planning, care fee protection, and ensuring your assets pass to the people you intend — not to a stranger who once married into the family. Trusts are not just for the rich — they’re for the smart. If you’d like to understand how a trust could protect your family’s wealth, the first step is a specialist consultation to assess your circumstances and identify the right approach.

Pre- and Post-Nuptial Agreements: A Complement to Trust Planning

A discretionary trust is often the cornerstone of family asset protection, but in our experience it works most effectively when considered alongside other planning tools — particularly pre-nuptial and post-nuptial agreements. With approximately 42% of marriages in England and Wales ending in divorce (Office for National Statistics), parents and grandparents are understandably anxious about preserving wealth that has taken decades to accumulate. Trusts and nuptial agreements are not mutually exclusive; they can work in concert to reinforce each other.

What Are Pre- and Post-Nuptial Agreements?

A pre-nuptial agreement is entered into before marriage, while a post-nuptial agreement is executed after the wedding. Neither is strictly legally binding in England and Wales in the way they are in some other jurisdictions. However, following the Supreme Court’s decision in Radmacher v Granatino [2010] UKSC 42, the courts will generally give significant weight to a nuptial agreement where it was freely entered into by both parties with full understanding of its implications. A family court exercising its discretion under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, Section 25 will consider all the circumstances, and a well-drafted agreement may meaningfully influence the outcome of financial remedy proceedings.

How Nuptial Agreements Interact With Trusts

Where assets are held in a discretionary trust, a nuptial agreement can expressly acknowledge that those assets form no part of either spouse’s personal estate. This may help to reinforce the trust’s separateness from the matrimonial pool, though courts retain an overriding discretion and will not be bound by any arrangement they consider unfair. In our experience, the combination of a properly constituted discretionary trust, a carefully drafted letter of wishes, and a nuptial agreement that references the trust structure provides the most robust framework available under English law — whilst remaining candid that no arrangement is entirely litigation-proof.

Revocable vs Irrevocable Trusts in Divorce Proceedings

This distinction matters considerably in divorce proceedings. A revocable trust — one the settlor can dissolve or reclaim assets from at will — is typically treated by courts as forming part of the settlor’s personal financial resources. Because the settlor retains effective control, a judge may treat the trust fund as available capital. An irrevocable trust, by contrast, places assets genuinely beyond the settlor’s control once established, which typically makes it harder for a divorcing spouse to argue those assets should be brought into account. That said, courts in England and Wales have shown a willingness to look behind trust structures where they suspect the arrangement was designed to defeat a spouse’s legitimate financial claims, particularly under section 37 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973. Early, well-documented planning — ideally predating any marital difficulties — is therefore essential. We would always recommend taking advice from a regulated family law solicitor alongside your estate planning.

Common Questions About Trusts and Divorce

Does putting money in a trust protect it from divorce?

It may do, but protection is not absolute. Assets held in a properly constituted irrevocable discretionary trust are generally not treated as belonging to any individual beneficiary, because no beneficiary has a fixed entitlement. A family court considering financial remedies under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, Section 25 must consider all the circumstances, and where a spouse is a discretionary beneficiary, the court may still regard the trust as a financial resource — even if it cannot order the trustees to pay out. The degree of protection depends heavily on how the trust was structured, when it was created, and whether it can genuinely be shown to be independent of the divorcing parties.

Can my ex-wife get my trust fund?

Not directly, in most cases. A trust fund does not belong to a beneficiary in the way a bank account does, and a court cannot ordinarily compel trustees to make a distribution to satisfy a divorce settlement. However, if a court concludes that you have real and practical access to trust assets — for example, because you are also a trustee, or because distributions have been made generously and regularly in the past — it may treat the trust as a resource and adjust other elements of the financial settlement accordingly. The position will depend on the specific facts and the terms of the trust deed.

What are the disadvantages of a life interest trust?

A life interest trust gives a named beneficiary the right to income or occupation of an asset during their lifetime, which offers less flexibility than a discretionary trust. Key disadvantages include: the life tenant’s interest may itself be treated as a matrimonial asset in divorce proceedings; the trust cannot easily be redirected if family circumstances change; and the remainder beneficiaries have no access to capital until the life interest ends. There are also inheritance tax considerations, including a potential charge on the trust fund when the life tenant dies.

What is the 10-year charge on a life interest trust?

Life interest trusts created on or after 22 March 2006 are generally treated as relevant property trusts for inheritance tax purposes and are therefore subject to the periodic charge. This charge arises every ten years and is currently up to 6% of the value of the trust fund above the nil-rate band (£325,000 for 2024/25). The precise calculation can be complex and takes into account the settlor’s cumulative chargeable transfers. Full guidance is available in HMRC’s Inheritance Tax Manual at IHTM42000. Our team can help you understand how this charge might apply to your specific circumstances before any structure is put in place.

How much does it cost to set up a life interest trust?

Costs vary depending on the complexity of the assets involved and the professional instructed to draft the trust deed. As a general guide, straightforward trust drafting by a solicitor may typically range from several hundred to several thousand pounds, with ongoing trustee and accountancy fees added where professional trustees are appointed. Where a property is being transferred into trust, you should also factor in potential stamp duty land tax implications and the cost of updating the Land Registry title. Our team can provide indicative guidance on what to expect before you commit to any particular structure.